NEWS Mental Health News Avoiding Ableist Language in Autism Research By Claire Gillespie Claire Gillespie Twitter Claire Gillespie is a freelance writer specializing in mental health. She’s written for The Washington Post, Vice, Health, Women’s Health, SELF, The Huffington Post, and many more. Learn about our editorial process Updated on October 24, 2020 Fact checked Verywell Mind content is rigorously reviewed by a team of qualified and experienced fact checkers. Fact checkers review articles for factual accuracy, relevance, and timeliness. We rely on the most current and reputable sources, which are cited in the text and listed at the bottom of each article. Content is fact checked after it has been edited and before publication. Learn more. by Emily Swaim Fact checked by Emily Swaim LinkedIn Emily is a board-certified science editor who has worked with top digital publishing brands like Voices for Biodiversity, Study.com, GoodTherapy, Vox, and Verywell. Learn about our editorial process Share Tweet Email Print Kinzie Riehm/Image Source/Getty Key Takeaways Autism researchers often use ableist language, which marginalizes autistic people by assuming disabled people are inferior to nondisabled people.Autism researchers can ask themselves a range of questions to determine whether their language is ableist. Discrimination against people with disabilities takes many forms–and it’s not always intentional. Autism researchers often use ableist language, according to a recent analysis published in Autism and Adulthood. The first estimate of the prevalence of autism in American adults, carried out by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in early 2020, estimates that about 1 in 45 (2.2%) adults are on the autism spectrum. And a 2016 survey of autism in children found that 1 in 68 (1.5%) 8-year-olds were identified as having autism. While autistic adults (including researchers and laypeople) have been discussing and writing about ableist language for many years, non-autistic autism researchers may not be acquainted with their work. The purpose of the Autism and Adulthood article is to ensure that all researchers are on the same page. What This Means For You Describing autism as something bad that needs to be fixed has a negative impact on how society views and treats people with autism, and it may even have an adverse effect on how an autistic person sees themself. By making positive changes in how we all write and speak about autism, we can help to create a more compassionate, inclusive society. What Is Ableism? “We define ableist language as any language that, when used, has the effect of marginalizing disabled people,” explains Kristen Bottema-Beutel, PhD, an associate professor at Lynch School of Education and Human Development at Boston College. Bottema-Beutel, who was the lead author of the Autism and Adulthood article, says examples are referring to autistic people as a “burden” or having a “disease,” and points out that the context in which words are used is important in determining whether language is ableist. Kristen Bottema-Beutel, PhD If researchers make efforts to talk, write, and communicate in ways that are not ableist, ideologies about autism will shift, and this can be a step toward reducing the marginalization of autistic people. — Kristen Bottema-Beutel, PhD Is Language Ableist? Bottema-Beutel and her co-authors provide a number of questions autism researchers can ask themselves to determine if their language is ableist (and these steps can be adapted for researchers who study a range of disabilities). Would I use this language if I were in a conversation with an autistic person?Does my language suggest that autistic people are inherently inferior to non-autistic people or assert that they lack something fundamental to being human?Does my language suggest that autism is something to be fixed, cured, controlled, or avoided?Does my language unnecessarily medicalize autism when describing educational supports?Does my language suggest to laypeople that the goal of my research is behavioral control and normalization, rather than granting as much autonomy and agency to autistic people as reasonably possible?Am I using particular words or phrases solely because it is a tradition in my field, even though autistic people have expressed that such language can be stigmatizing?Does my language unnecessarily ‘‘other’’ autistic people by suggesting that characteristics of autism bear no relationships to characteristics of non-autistic people? The Bigger Picture These efforts are all part of a much bigger picture. “If researchers make efforts to talk, write, and communicate in ways that are not ableist, ideologies about autism will shift,” Bottema-Beutel says. “This can be a step toward reducing the marginalization of autistic people.” Bottema-Beutel points out that professionals who are employed to support autistic people often receive guidance from researchers, which is designed to be helpful. But it’s not going to be helpful for autistic people if it is couched in, and perpetuates, ableist ideologies. Paige Siper, PhD The use of ableist language dehumanizes individuals with ASD and suggests inferiority, which can result in discrimination. Neurodiversity plays a meaningful role in society, and the use of intentional language to describe and portray differences is critical to create a more accepting world. — Paige Siper, PhD Even if you're not a habitual reader of scientific research, it plays a crucial role in the perception of health conditions and neurodevelopmental disabilities, like autism, in mainstream culture. "Avoiding ableist language when reporting research findings destigmatizes ASD while promoting acceptance and inclusion of people with ASD," says Paige Siper, PhD, chief psychologist at the Seaver Autism Center for Research and Treatment at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. "The use of ableist language dehumanizes individuals with ASD and suggests inferiority, which can result in discrimination," Siper continues. "Neurodiversity plays a meaningful role in society, and the use of intentional language to describe and portray differences is critical to create a more accepting world." Helpful Resources Autism Source, the Autism Society's Online Resource Database is a comprehensive list of autism-related services and supports across the United States. The New Zealand website Altogether Autism Information Hub provides information on autism at all life stages, from early childhood to adulthood. Autism Now, an initiative of The Arc and The Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AIDD), is a national resource and information center for Americans with ASD and their families. 3 Sources Verywell Mind uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy. Bottema-Beutel K, Kapp SK, Lester JN, Sasson NJ, Hand BN. Avoiding ableist language: suggestions for autism researchers. Autism in Adulthood. 2020. doi:10.1089/aut.2020.0014 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Key findings: CDC releases first estimates of the number of adults living with autism spectrum disorder in the United States. Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network. Community Report on Autism 2016. By Claire Gillespie Claire Gillespie is a freelance writer specializing in mental health. She’s written for The Washington Post, Vice, Health, Women’s Health, SELF, The Huffington Post, and many more. See Our Editorial Process Meet Our Review Board Share Feedback Was this page helpful? Thanks for your feedback! What is your feedback? Other Helpful Report an Error Submit Speak to a Therapist Online Advertiser Disclosure × The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Verywell Mind receives compensation.