The Trait Theory of Personality

Trait theory of personality

Verywell / Brianna Gilmartin

If someone asked you to describe a close friend's personality, what kind of things would you say? A few things that might come to mind are descriptive terms, such as "outgoing," "kind" and "even-tempered." All of these represent traits. What exactly does this the word "trait" mean?

A trait can be thought of as a relatively stable characteristic that causes individuals to behave in certain ways. The trait approach to personality is one of the major theoretical areas in the study of personality. The trait theory suggests that individual personalities are composed of these broad dispositions.

Unlike many other theories of personality, such as psychoanalytic or humanistic theories, the trait approach to personality is focused on differences between individuals. The combination and interaction of various traits form a personality that is unique to each individual. Trait theory is focused on identifying and measuring these individual personality characteristics.

Gordon Allport’s Trait Theory

In 1936, psychologist Gordon Allport found that one English-language dictionary alone contained more than 4,000 words describing different personality traits. He categorized these traits into three levels:

  • Cardinal traits: Allport suggested that cardinal traits are rare, and dominate, usually developing later in life. They tend to define a person to such an extent that their names become synonymous with their personality. Examples of this include the following descriptive terms: Machiavellian, narcissistic, Don Juan, and Christ-like.
  • Central traits: These general characteristics form basic personality foundations. While central traits are not as dominating as cardinal traits, they describe the major characteristics you might use to describe another person. Terms such as "intelligent," "honest," "shy," and "anxious" are considered central traits.
  • Secondary traits: Secondary traits are sometimes related to attitudes or preferences. They often appear only in certain situations or under specific circumstances. Some examples include public speaking anxiety, or impatience while waiting in line.

Cattell’s 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire

Trait theorist Raymond Cattell reduced the number of main personality traits from Allport’s initial list of over 4,000 down to 171. He did so primarily by eliminating uncommon traits and combining common characteristics.

Next, Cattell rated a large sample of individuals for these 171 different traits. Then, using a statistical technique known as factor analysis, he identified closely related terms and eventually reduced his list to just 16 key personality traits.

According to Cattell, these 16 traits are the source of all human personality. He also developed one of the most widely used personality assessments known as the "16 Personality Factor Questionnaire."

Eysenck’s 3 Dimensions of Personality

British psychologist Hans Eysenck developed a model of personality based upon just three universal trails.

  • Introversion/extraversionIntroversion involves directing attention to inner experiences, while extroversion relates to focusing attention outward on other people and the environment. A person high in introversion might be quiet and reserved, while an individual high in extroversion might be sociable and outgoing.
  • Neuroticism/emotional stability: This dimension of Eysenck’s trait theory is related to moodiness versus even-temperateness. Neuroticism refers to an individual’s tendency to become upset or emotional, while stability refers to the tendency to remain emotionally constant.
  • Psychoticism: Later, after studying individuals suffering from mental illness, Eysenck added a personality dimension he called psychoticism to his trait theory. Individuals who are high on this trait tend to have difficulty dealing with reality and may be antisocial, hostile, non-empathetic, and manipulative.

The 5-Factor Theory of Personality

Both Cattell’s and Eysenck’s theories have been the subject of considerable research. This has led some theorists to believe that Cattell focused on too many traits, while Eysenck focused on too few. As a result, a new trait theory often referred to as the "Big Five" theory emerged.

This five-factor model of personality represents five core traits that interact to form human personality. While researchers often disagree about the exact labels for each dimension, the following are described most commonly:

  • Agreeableness
  • Conscientiousness
  • Extraversion
  • Neuroticism
  • Openness

Assessing the Trait Theory

Most theorists and psychologists agree that people can be described based on their personality traits. Yet, theorists continue to debate the number of basic traits that make up human personality. While trait theory has an objectivity that some personality theories lack (such as Freud’s psychoanalytic theory), it also has weaknesses.

Some of the most common criticisms of trait theory center on the fact that traits are often poor predictors of behavior. While an individual may score high on assessments of a specific trait, he may not always behave that way in every situation. Another problem is those trait theories do not address how or why individual differences in personality develop or emerge.

A Word From Verywell

The study of personality and what shapes and influences each person is fascinating. As you can see, those who study this field have varying opinions. However, they do build off one another, and theorists tend to refine the work of their predecessors, which is common in all scientific pursuits.

What is most important to understand is that everyone has different personality traits. We each have certain traits that dominate our personality with a myriad of traits that can arise in different situations. Also, our traits can change over time and can be shaped by our experiences.

Was this page helpful?
5 Sources
Verywell Mind uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.
  1. Fajkowska M, Kreitler S. Status of the Trait Concept in Contemporary Personality Psychology: Are the Old Questions Still the Burning Questions?. J Pers. 2018;86(1):5-11.doi: 10.1111/jopy.12335

  2. Fleeson W, Jayawickreme E. Whole Trait Theory. J Res Pers. 2015;56:82–92. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009

  3. Friedman AF, Sasek J, Wakefield JA. Subjective ratings of Cattell's 16 Personality Factors. J Pers Assess. 1976;40(3):302-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4003_9

  4. Hampson SE. Personality processes: mechanisms by which personality traits "get outside the skin"Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:315–339. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100419

  5. McCrae RR, Sutin AR. A Five-Factor Theory Perspective on Causal AnalysisEur J Pers. 2018;32(3):151–166. doi:10.1002/per.2134

Additional Reading
  • Allport GW. Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston: 1937.
  • Cattell RB. Personality a Systematic Theoretical and Factual Study. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1950.
  • Eysenck HJ. The Structure of Human Personality. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1947.
  • McCrae RR, Costa PT. Personality Trait Structure as a Human Universal. American Psychologist. 1997:52;509-516.