Phrenology's History and Influence

Profile view of a phrenology head.
Tetra Images / Getty Images

Could a bump on the back of your head offer a clue to your inner personality? This idea was a central theme in pseudoscience known as phrenology, a discipline that involved linking bumps on a person's head to certain aspects of the individual's personality and character.

Let's take a closer look at how phrenology came to be, its rise to popularity, and its influence on psychology.

A Brief History of Phrenology

Phrenology originated in the late 1700s in Vienna as German physician Franz Joseph Gall's theory of "organology," and was later popularized as phrenology by Gall's assistant, a German physician named Johann Gaspar Spurzheim. Gall noticed that the cerebral cortex of humans was much larger than that of animals, which he believed was what made humans intellectually superior. Eventually, he became convinced that the physical features of the cortex could also be seen in the shape and size of the skull. In other words, he believed that bumps on the surface of the brain could be detected by feeling the bumps on the surface of an individual's head.

After examining the heads of a number of young pickpockets, Gall found that many of them had bumps on their skull just above their ears. He then suggested that the bumps, indentations, and overall shape of the skull could be linked to different aspects of a person's personality, character, and abilities. With his young pickpockets, for example, he suggested that the bump behind their ears was associated with "acquisitiveness," or a tendency to steal, lie, or deceive.

In his book on the subject of phrenology, Gall suggested that:

  • Moral and intellectual faculties were innate. In other words, people were born with their moral character and intelligence. If you were a thief, it was because you were born with a predisposition to deceitfulness.
  • The exercise or manifestation of these faculties depended on their organization.
  • The brain controlled all of the propensities, sentiments and faculties. 
  • The brain was composed of as many organs as there are different faculties, propensities, and sentiments.
  • The form of the skull represented and reflected the form and development of the brain's organs.

Gall sought support for his ideas by measuring the skulls of people in prisons, hospitals, and asylums, especially those with odd-shaped heads. Based on what he found, Gall developed a system of 27 different "faculties" that he believed could be directly diagnosed by assessing specific parts of the head.

He also created a chart that showed which areas of the skull were associated with specific traits or characteristics.

The 27 "Faculties" in Phrenology

So what exactly were Gall's 27 faculties? The following list accounts for the ones he identified, each of which he believed corresponded to a particular region of the head.

  1. Reproductive instincts
  2. The love of one's offspring
  3. Affection and friendship
  4. Self-defense, courage, and fighting
  5. Murderous instincts
  6. Guile, acuteness; cleverness
  7. Sense of property; the tendency to steal
  8. Pride, arrogance, haughtiness, love of authority, loftiness
  9. Vanity, ambition, love of glory
  10. Circumspection, forethought
  11. Aptitude for being educated
  12. Sense of locality and place
  13. Recollection of people
  14. Verbal memory
  15. Language ability
  16. The sense of colors
  17. Sense for sound and musical talent
  18. Mathematical abilities
  19. Mechanical abilities
  20. Comparative sagacity
  21. Metaphysics
  22. Satire and wit
  23. Poetic talent
  24. Kindness; compassion; sensitivity; moral sense
  25. Imitation and mimicry
  26. Religiosity
  27. Perseverance, firmness

Problems With Gall's Phrenology

However, Gall's methods lacked scientific rigor and he chose to simply ignore any evidence that contradicted his ideas. Despite this, phrenology became increasingly popular from the 1800s well into the early 1900s. Having your head examined by a phrenologist was a popular activity during the Victorian era and it remained fairly popular even after scientific evidence began to mount against Gall's ideas.

Gall's ideas gained many followers, but he began to attract considerable criticism from scientists as well as other groups. The Catholic church believed that his suggestion of a "religion organ" was atheistic, and in 1802, his publications were added to the church's Index of Prohibited Books.

After Gall's death in 1828, some of his followers continued to develop phrenology, and references of the theory began seeping into mainstream popular culture.

Despite phrenology's brief popularity, it eventually became viewed as pseudoscience much like astrology, numerology, and palmistry. Criticism from some of the best-known brain researchers played an important role in this reversal of popular views of phrenology.

During the early- to mid-1800s, the renowned French physician Marie Jean Pierre Flourens, a pioneer in brain studies and cerebral localization, found that the fundamental assumption of phrenology — that the contours of the skull corresponded to the underlying shape of the brain — was wrong.

In 1844, the French physiologist Francois Magendie also summed up his dismissal of phrenology in by writing in his book, the Elementary Treatise on Human Physiology:

"Phrenology, a pseudo-science of the present day; like astrology, necromancy, and alchemy of former times, pretends to localize in the brain the different kinds of memory. But its efforts are mere assertions, which will no bear examination for an instant."

Influence of Phrenology

While phrenology has long been identified as a pseudoscience, it did help make important contributions to the field of neurology. Thanks to the focus on phrenology, researchers became more interested in the concept of cortical localization, an idea that suggested that certain mental functions were localized in particular areas of the brain.

While Gall and other phrenologists incorrectly believed that bumps on the head corresponded to personality and abilities, they were correct in believing that different mental abilities were associated with different areas of the brain. Modern research methods allow scientists to use sophisticated tools such as MRI and PET scans to learn more about the localization of function within the brain.

Was this page helpful?
Article Sources
Verywell Mind uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.
  1. Parker Jones O, Alfaro-Almagro F, Jbabdi S. An empirical, 21st century evaluation of phrenologyCortex. 2018;106:26–35. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.04.011

  2. Wiley Online Library. Franz Joseph Gall's non‐cortical faculties and their organs. September 9, 2019. doi:10.1002/jhbs.21994

  3. Fowler O, Folwer L. New Illustrated Self-instructor in Phrenology and Physiology. New York: S.R. Wells & Company; 1877.

  4. Gall FJ. On the Functions of the Brain and of Each of Its Parts. Boston: Marsh, Capen & Lyon; 1835.

  5. Anderson JF. Criminological Theories - Understanding Crime in America. Greenville, North Carolina: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2015 

  6. York University. The 27 Faculties of Franz Joseph Gall.

  7. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Phrenology - Pseudoscientific Practice

  8. Lawson R, Graham J, Baker KM. A History of Psychology: Globalization, Ideas, and Applications. New York: Routledge; 2007. 

  9. Dempsey-Jones H. Popular Science. The 'science' of linking skull shape to personality has finally been tested, and boy is it as stupid as we thought - Neuroscientists examine the dubious theory of phrenology. January 23, 2018. 

  10. Levinson S. Return of the living dead: Re-reading Pierre Flourens' contributions to neurophysiology and literature. Prog Brain Res. 2013;205:149-72. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-63273-9.00009-5

  11. Sutterer MJ, Tranel D. Neuropsychology and cognitive neuroscience in the fMRI era: A recapitulation of localizationist and connectionist viewsNeuropsychology. 2017;31(8):972–980. doi:10.1037/neu0000408

  12. Catana C, Drzezga A, Heiss WD, Rosen BR. PET/MRI for neurologic applicationsJ Nucl Med. 2012;53(12):1916–1925. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.105346

Additional Reading